z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Federal Coal Program Reform, the Clean Power Plan, and the Interaction of Upstream and Downstream Climate Policies
Author(s) -
Todd Gerarden,
W. Spencer Reeder,
James H. Stock
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american economic journal economic policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.868
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1945-7731
pISSN - 1945-774X
DOI - 10.1257/pol.20160246
Subject(s) - upstream (networking) , downstream (manufacturing) , coal , carbon leakage , fossil fuel , leakage (economics) , greenhouse gas , natural resource economics , social cost , supply side , environmental science , plan (archaeology) , climate policy , business , economics , environmental engineering , environmental economics , waste management , engineering , operations management , ecology , microeconomics , geography , telecommunications , macroeconomics , archaeology , biology
Can supply-side environmental policies that limit the extraction of fossil fuels reduce CO 2 emissions? This paper studies interactions between a specific supply-side policy—a carbon surcharge on federal coal royalties—and regulation of emissions from the power sector under the Clean Air Act. Estimates from a detailed dynamic model of the power sector suggest that, absent new downstream regulation, a royalty surcharge equal to the social cost of carbon would generate three-quarters of the emissions reductions originally projected for the Clean Power Plan (CPP), with an average abatement cost roughly equal to the social cost of carbon. Were the CPP in place, the royalty surcharge would reduce emissions by reducing leakage and causing the CPP to be nonbinding in some scenarios. (JEL Q35, Q38, Q48, Q54, Q58)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom