z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Are Information Disclosures Effective? Evidence from the Credit Card Market
Author(s) -
Enrique Seira,
Alan Elizondo,
Eduardo Laguna-Müggenburg
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american economic journal economic policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.868
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1945-7731
pISSN - 1945-774X
DOI - 10.1257/pol.20140404
Subject(s) - credit card , business , population , randomized experiment , government (linguistics) , salient , actuarial science , control (management) , interest rate , monetary economics , economics , finance , payment , political science , law , medicine , linguistics , philosophy , demography , management , pathology , sociology
Consumer protection in financial markets in the form of information disclosure is high on governments agendas, despite the fact that the empirical evidence on its effectiveness is scarce. To measure the impact of Truth-in-Lending-Act-type disclosures on default and indebtedness, as well as of debiasing warning messages and social comparison information, we implement a randomized control trial in the credit card market for a large population of indebted cardholders. We find that providing salient interest rate disclosures has no effect, while social comparisons and debiasing messages have only a odest effect. Other types of disclosures discussed in the paper could have larger effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom