z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Collective Self-Control
Author(s) -
Alessandro Lizzeri,
Leeat Yariv
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american economic journal microeconomics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.339
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 1945-7685
pISSN - 1945-7669
DOI - 10.1257/mic.20150325
Subject(s) - consumption (sociology) , collective action , paternalism , economics , government (linguistics) , action (physics) , intervention (counseling) , microeconomics , welfare , public economics , economic interventionism , distortion (music) , dynamic inconsistency , politics , rent seeking , control (management) , law and economics , political science , market economy , psychology , law , sociology , computer science , social science , philosophy , psychiatry , amplifier , computer network , linguistics , bandwidth (computing) , management , quantum mechanics , physics
Behavioral economics presents a "paternalistic" rationale for a benevolent government's intervention. We consider an economy where the only "distortion" is agents' time-inconsistency. We study the desirability of various forms of collective action, ones pertaining to costly commitment and ones pertaining to the timing of consumption, when government decisions respond to voters' preferences via the political process. Three messages emerge. First, welfare is highest under either full centralization or laissez-faire. Second, introducing collective action only on consumption decisions yields no commitment. Last, individuals' relative preferences for commitment may reverse depending on whether future consumption decisions are centralized or not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom