z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Public Goods, Social Pressure, and the Choice Between Privacy and Publicity
Author(s) -
Andrew F. Daughety,
Jennifer F. Reinganum
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american economic journal microeconomics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.339
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 1945-7685
pISSN - 1945-7669
DOI - 10.1257/mic.2.2.191
Subject(s) - unobservable , publicity , action (physics) , distortion (music) , microeconomics , perception , public good , economics , marginal utility , willingness to pay , business , econometrics , computer science , psychology , marketing , amplifier , computer network , physics , bandwidth (computing) , quantum mechanics , neuroscience
We model privacy as an agent's choice of action being unobservable to others. An agent derives utility from his action, the aggregate of agents' actions, and other agents' perceptions of his type. If his action is unobservable, he takes his full-information optimal action and is pooled with other types, while if observable, then he distorts it to enhance others' perceptions of him. This increases the public good, but the disutility from distortion is a social cost. When the disutility of distortion is high (low) relative to the marginal utility of the public good, a policy of privacy (publicity) is optimal. (JEL D82, H41)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom