English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is much in the paper by Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis [“The Revenge of Homo Economicus: Contested Exchange and the Revival of Political Economy”] with which I agree. But there are also real differences—which is to be expected, since they and I examine economic organization through very different lenses. Thus whereas they view economic organization through the lens of power and contested exchange, I believe that economizing and governance is, for most purposes, a more productive perspective. I also have a variety of minor differences with their paper.

Contested Exchange Versus the Governance of Contractual Relations