z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Retrospectives: On the Genius Behind David Ricardo's 1817 Formulation of Comparative Advantage
Author(s) -
Daniel M. Bernhofen,
John C. Brown
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of economic perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 9.614
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1944-7965
pISSN - 0895-3309
DOI - 10.1257/jep.32.4.227
Subject(s) - exposition (narrative) , interpretation (philosophy) , economics , generality , mill , genius , paragraph , neoclassical economics , comparative advantage , unit (ring theory) , mathematical economics , positive economics , classical economics , keynesian economics , philosophy , mathematics , law , history , literature , political science , management , art history , art , linguistics , mathematics education , archaeology
Last year marked the 200th anniversary of Ricardo’s famous “four numbers” paragraph on comparative advantage, which is one of the oldest analytical results in economics. Following the lead of James Mill (1821), these four numbers have been interpreted as unit labor coefficients. This interpretation has provided the basis for the development of the ‘Ricardian model’ from John Stuart Mill (1852) to Eaton and Kortum (2002). However, if we accept the labor unit interpretation of these numbers, Ricardo’s exposition in his 1817 Principles of Political Economy and Taxation makes little logical sense. Building on Sraffa’s (1930) interpretation of Ricardo’s numbers as labor embodied in trade, our discussion reveals the amazing simplicity and generality of Ricardo’s comparative advantage formulation and gains-from-trade logic.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom