Experimentation at Scale
Author(s) -
Karthik Muralidharan,
Paul Niehaus
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the journal of economic perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 9.614
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1944-7965
pISSN - 0895-3309
DOI - 10.1257/jep.31.4.103
Subject(s) - randomized experiment , scale (ratio) , computer science , sampling frame , sampling (signal processing) , econometrics , frame (networking) , work (physics) , unit (ring theory) , randomization , randomized controlled trial , data science , industrial engineering , statistics , psychology , mathematics , mathematics education , sociology , engineering , medicine , geography , population , cartography , mechanical engineering , telecommunications , demography , filter (signal processing) , surgery , computer vision
This paper makes the case for greater use of randomized experiments “at scale.” We review various critiques of experimental program evaluation in developing countries, and discuss how experimenting at scale along three specific dimensions – the size of the sampling frame, the number of units treated, and the size of the unit of randomization – can help alleviate them. We find that program evaluation randomized controlled trials published in top journals over the last 15 years have typically been “small” in these senses, but also identify a number of examples – including from our own work – demonstrating that experimentation at much larger scales is both feasible and valuable.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom