The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?
Author(s) -
Benjamin Klein
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the journal of economic perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 9.614
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1944-7965
pISSN - 0895-3309
DOI - 10.1257/jep.15.2.45
Subject(s) - competition (biology) , position (finance) , market power , distribution (mathematics) , microsoft excel , service provider , service (business) , business , economics , industrial organization , microeconomics , marketing , computer science , monopoly , operating system , finance , ecology , mathematical analysis , mathematics , biology
This paper examines the competitive actions taken by Microsoft in its "browser war" with Netscape, most importantly Microsoft's decisions to give away Explorer free of charge, integrate Explorer into its dominant Windows operating system and pay online service providers for exclusive distribution. Consumers benefited significantly from these actions, but the fundamental economic question is whether Microsoft abused its existing market power when competing in this way. A detailed analysis of Microsoft's conduct and the economics of competition for distribution suggests that severe limits placed on Microsoft's behavior would not be welfare.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom