z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government—Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?
Author(s) -
Stanley Fischer
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
the journal of economic perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 9.614
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1944-7965
pISSN - 0895-3309
DOI - 10.1257/jep.15.2.3
Subject(s) - economics , exchange rate , monetary policy , monetary economics , point (geometry) , statement (logic) , capital flows , capital (architecture) , keynesian economics , macroeconomics , international economics , neoclassical economics , political science , law , profit (economics) , geometry , mathematics , archaeology , history
The bipolar or two-corner solution view of exchange rates is that intermediate policy regimes between hard pegs and floating are not sustainable. This paper argues that the proponents of the bipolar view have probably exaggerated their point. The right statement is that for countries open to international capital flows, softly pegged exchange rates are crisis-prone and not sustainable over long periods. However, a wide variety of flexible rate arrangements remains possible. Monetary and exchange rate policy in most countries should not and will not be indifferent to exchange rate movements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom