Divest, Disregard, or Double Down? Philanthropic Endowment Investments in Objectionable Firms
Author(s) -
Brigitte Roth Tran
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
american economic review insights
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2640-2068
pISSN - 2640-205X
DOI - 10.1257/aeri.20180347
Subject(s) - divestment , endowment , economics , investment (military) , alternative investment , order (exchange) , microeconomics , profit (economics) , hedge , hedge fund , finance , ecology , philosophy , epistemology , politics , political science , transaction cost , law , biology
How much, if at all, should an endowment invest in a firm whose activities run counter to the charitable missions the endowment funds? I offer the first model characterizing this type of investment decision. I introduce a strategy called “mission hedging,” where—in contrast to traditional socially responsible investing—foundations may benefit from skewing investment toward the objectionable firm in order to align funding availability with need. I characterize the trade-offs driving foundation investment decisions. By leveraging the idiosyncratic firm risk typically diversified away in profit-maximizing portfolios, foundations may find that bad actors provide good opportunities to hedge mission-specific risks. (JEL G11, G14, L31, M14)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom