English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Bhattacharya et al. (Bhattacharya, A., Sudha, S., Chandra, H. S. and Steward, R. (1999) Development 126, 5485–5493) reported that loss-of-function mutations in the flex (female-specific lethal on X) gene caused female-specific lethality because flex(+) acts as a positive regulator of the master switch gene Sex lethal (Sxl). Sxl is essential for female development. Key to their conclusion was the ability of flex mutations to suppress the male lethality caused by Sxl(M) mutations, which inappropriately activate Sxl female-specific expression. Here we report our contrary findings that flex mutations fail to suppress even the weakest Sxl(M)alleles, arguing against the proposed regulatory relationship between flex and Sxl. Instead we show that the lethal flex phenotype depends on the absence of a Y chromosome, not on the presence of two X chromosomes. flex lethality is caused by a defect in the functioning of the X-linked rDNA locus called bobbed, since this defect is complemented by the corresponding wild-type rDNA complex on the Y.

A lesson from flex: consider the Y chromosome when assessing Drosophila sex-specific lethals