A Randomized Trial of Breakthrough Pain During Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Epidural Labor Analgesia in Parous Women | Zendy

Stephanie R. Goodman | Zendy; Richard M. Smiley | Zendy; Maria Negron | Zendy; Paula A. Freedman | Zendy; Ruth Landau | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Randomized Trial of Breakthrough Pain During Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Epidural Labor Analgesia in Parous Women

Author(s) -

Stephanie R. Goodman,

Richard M. Smiley,

Maria Negron,

Paula A. Freedman,

Ruth Landau

Publication year - 2008

Publication title -

anesthesia and analgesia

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.404

H-Index - 201

eISSN - 1526-7598

pISSN - 0003-2999

DOI - 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f896f

Subject(s) - medicine , bupivacaine , fentanyl , anesthesia , cervical dilation , confidence interval , randomized controlled trial , intrathecal , significant difference , visual analogue scale , combined spinal epidural , surgery , pregnancy , gestation , biology , genetics

There is controversy regarding the benefits and risks of combined spinal-epidural compared with epidural analgesia (CSE, EPID) for labor analgesia. We hypothesized that CSE would result in fewer patient requests for top-up doses compared to EPID.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research