
Genome-Wide Dynamics of Chromatin Binding of Estrogen Receptors α and β: Mutual Restriction and Competitive Site Selection
Author(s) -
Tze Howe Charn,
Edison Tak Bun Liu,
Edmond ChinPing Chang,
Yew Kok Lee,
John A. Katzenellenbogen,
Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
molecular endocrinology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1944-9917
pISSN - 0888-8809
DOI - 10.1210/me.2009-0252
Subject(s) - chromatin , biology , estrogen receptor , chromatin immunoprecipitation , transcription factor , binding site , chia pet , estrogen receptor alpha , estrogen receptor beta , nuclear receptor , hormone response element , dna binding site , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , gene expression , chromatin remodeling , promoter , cancer , breast cancer
Estrogen receptors ERalpha and ERbeta, members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, exert profound effects on the gene expression and biological response programs of their target cells. Herein, we explore the dynamic interplay between these two receptors in their selection of chromatin binding sites when present separately or together in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Treatment of cells (containing ERalpha only, ERbeta only, or ERalpha and ERbeta) with estradiol or ER subtype-selective ligands was followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis with a custom-designed tiling array for ER binding sites across the genome to examine the effects of ligand-occupied and unoccupied ERalpha and ERbeta on chromatin binding. There was substantial overlap in binding sites for these estradiol-liganded nuclear receptors when present alone, but many fewer sites were shared when both ERs were present. Each ER restricted the binding site occupancy of the other, with ERalpha generally being dominant. Binding sites of both receptors were highly enriched in estrogen response element motifs, but when both ERs were present, ERalpha displaced ERbeta, shifting it into new sites less enriched in estrogen response elements. Binding regions of the two ERs also showed differences in their enrichments for other transcription factor binding motifs. Studies with ER subtype-specific ligands revealed that it was the liganded subtype that principally determined the spectrum of chromatin binding. These findings highlight the dynamic interplay between the two ERs in their selection of chromatin binding sites, with competition, restriction, and site shifting having important implications for the regulation of gene expression by these two nuclear receptors.