English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: The incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) is increasing globally and has been associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study we aimed to compare tumor characteristics, disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) of GEP-NET patients (pts) with and without DM. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (SEER) linked to Medicare claims, we identified pts diagnosed with GEP-NET between January 1995 and December 2010, aged ≥65 years at the time of GEP-NET diagnosis. We included patients who were in exclusive Medicare coverage without healthcare management organizations and had Medicare Parts A and B coverage for ≥1year after GEP-NET diagnosis or until death. Within the pts with GEP-NET diagnosis, we identified those without a diagnosis of DM prior to the GEP-NET diagnosis. We compared baseline sociodemographics, co-morbidities, and GEP-NET location, stage, grade and treatment between pts with and without DM using χ 2 analysis. Kaplan Meier (KM) curves were used to compare OS and DSS up to 10 years between the DM and non-DM groups. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to compare the DSS between the groups, adjusting for confounding variables. Results: We identified a cohort of 1,969 well-characterized GEP-NET patients with accurate tumor stage, grade, comorbidities, and treatment data. 478 (25.7%) had DM and 1,383 (74.3%) did not have DM. There were no statistically significant differences in gender or age at the time of GEP-NET diagnosis in the DM (mean age 74.7±SD 6.6 yrs) and non-DM (74.9±7.4 yrs) groups. Significant differences in race were found in the DM (80.6% white, 13.6% black, 1.3% hispanic) and non-DM (86.8% white, 8.2% black, 1.8% Hispanic) groups (p=0.002). Patients with DM had more gastric (14.7%), duodenal (10.9%) and pancreatic (21.0%), and less jejunal/ ileal (12.8%) NETs compared with the non-DM group (9.7%, 6.4%, 16.9%, 18.2%, respectively, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Patients with DM had earlier stage disease than those without DM (p=0.0012), but no difference in tumor grade or treatment was found. KM curves revealed no differences in OS and DSS in the GEP-NET patients with and without DM across all stages. Multivariate adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model found no significant difference in DSS between those with and without DM (HR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.76–1.24). Compared with pts with pancreatic NETs, pts with colon (HR=1.39, 95%CI: 1.04–1.86) had worse survival, while those with jejunal/ileal (HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.42–0.83) NETs had a better survival. Discussion: This is the first study to investigate the effect of DM on survival of pts GEP-NETs. We found a high prevalence of pre-existing DM in pts with GEP-NETs, but no difference in OS or DSS in pts with and without DM. Interestingly, pts with DM had more foregut GEP-NETs which may suggest mechanistic links between DM and GEP-NETs at these sites.

SUN-626 Survival of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Diabetes Mellitus in a Seer-Medicare Cohort