z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
MON-588 Anthropometric Parameters, Body Fat Percentage and Metabolic Profile in Sarcopenic Women with Recommendation for Bariatric Surgery
Author(s) -
Nara Carvalho,
Caio Chaves de Holanda Limeira,
Heloisa Calegari Borges,
Débora Nóbrega Lima,
Patrícia Nunes Mesquita,
Gitana Silva Rego,
Narriane Chaves Pereira de Holanda,
Vinícius José Baccin Martins,
João Modesto Filho,
Flávia Pimenta,
José Luiz de Brito Alves
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the endocrine society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.046
H-Index - 20
ISSN - 2472-1972
DOI - 10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1875
Subject(s) - sarcopenic obesity , medicine , sarcopenia , anthropometry , obesity , body mass index , insulin resistance , endocrinology
Sarcopenia (SARC) is a musculoskeletal disorder that predisposes several complications, including metabolic ones. Obesity also provides higher risk for metabolic complications, however, there is lack of evidences regarding the association of obesity with SARC on metabolic parameters in non-elderly individuals. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anthropometric parameters, body fat percentage (BFP) and metabolic parameters in women with and without SARC preceding Bariatric Surgery (BS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 60 obese women in the outpatient care in a public Brazilian University Hospital between March to September 2018. Body composition was given by bio-impedance (inbody-370), multifrequency (5, 50, 250Hz) with 12 hours fasting, dominant Handgrip Strength (HS) was evaluated by Jamar dynamometer (3 measurements; 30 sec interval). Were also evaluated fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). SARC was defined by the association of a low muscle mass index (weight-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass: ASMM/weight x 100%) and decreased HS, using as cutoff points the smallest quintile for each variable. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and independent t-test was used for comparison between groups. Statistics were made by SPSS software, 20th version (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The mean age, weight, body mass index and BFP of sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic women were: 40.75 ± 11 x 39.23 ± 8.92 years old (p=0.665), 102.93 ± 9.58 x 109.19 ± 14.25 Kg (p=0.237), 44.88 ± 2.7 x 42.24 ± 4.79 Kg/m2 and 54.12 ± 1.11 x 51.44 ± 3.43% (p=0.052), respectively. Regarding the laboratory parameters of women with and without SARC: fasting blood glucose 89.25 ± 14.48 x 98.40 ± 27.48 mg/dL (p=0.359), HbA1c 5.83 ± 0.33 x 6.21 ± 1.18% (p=0.185), HOMA-IR 3.61 ± 1.28 x 5.31 ± 4.74 (p=0.160), TC 170.87 ± 39.36 x 180.82 ± 34.51 mg/dL, LDL 94.67 ± 26.63 x 105.60 ± 30.85 mg/dL, HDL 53.37 ± 18.50 x 50.84 ± 10.32 mg/dL, triglycerides 114.12 ± 38.84 x 127.30 ± 75.04 mg/dL and hs-CRP 8.51 ± 6.50 x 7.51 ±6.52 mg/L (p=0.792). CONCLUSION: Women with SARC and recommendation for BS when compared to women without SARC had similar anthropometric, metabolic and BFP parameters.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom