z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Disparate Outcomes from Applying U.K. and U.S. Osteoporosis Treatment Guidelines
Author(s) -
Mark J Bolland,
Andrew Grey
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.206
H-Index - 353
eISSN - 1945-7197
pISSN - 0021-972X
DOI - 10.1210/jc.2009-2157
Subject(s) - medicine , osteoporosis , guideline , hip fracture , context (archaeology) , physical therapy , cohort , densitometry , randomized controlled trial , cohort study , bone density , paleontology , biology , pathology
After the advent of absolute fracture risk calculators, guidelines for the management of osteoporosis released by the U.S.-based National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) and the U.K.-based National Osteoporosis Guidelines Group (NOGG) differ markedly in their approaches to treatment recommendations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom