Progressive Reduction in Body Weight after Treatment with the Amylin Analog Pramlintide in Obese Subjects: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study
Author(s) -
Louis J. Aronne,
Ken Fujioka,
Vanita R. Aroda,
Kim Chen,
Amy E. Halseth,
Nicole C. Kesty,
Colleen Burns,
Cameron W. Lush,
Christian Weyer
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.206
H-Index - 353
eISSN - 1945-7197
pISSN - 0021-972X
DOI - 10.1210/jc.2006-2003
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , tolerability , amylin , weight loss , body mass index , endocrinology , insulin , obesity , adverse effect , alternative medicine , islet , pathology
Context: In previous 1-yr trials, treatment with pramlintide (120 μg), an analog of the β-cell hormone amylin, induced sustained reductions in A1C and body weight in insulin-using subjects with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To assess the potential of pramlintide as an antiobesity agent, we assessed the weight effect, safety, and tolerability of pramlintide in non-insulin-treated obese subjects with and without type 2 diabetes at doses greater than previously studied. Design/Setting: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients: A total of 204 obese subjects [80/20% female/male, age 48 ± 10 yr, and body mass index 37.8 ± 5.6 kg/m2 (mean ± sd)] participated in the study. Intervention: For 16 wk, without concomitant lifestyle intervention, subjects self-administered pramlintide (nonforced dose escalation ≤ 240 μg) or placebo via sc injection three times a day before meals. Main Outcome Measures: Weight, waist circumference, tolerability, and safety were the main outcome measures. Results: Pramlintide was generally well tolerated, with 88% of subjects able to escalate to the maximum dose of 240 μg. Withdrawal rates were similar between placebo (25%) and pramlintide-treated subjects (29%). Subjects completing 16 wk of pramlintide treatment experienced placebo-corrected reductions in body weight of 3.7 ± 0.5% (3.6 ± 0.6 kg; P < 0.001) and waist circumference (3.6 ± 1.1 cm; P < 0.01). Approximately 31% of pramlintide-treated subjects achieved ≥5% weight loss (vs. 2% placebo; P < 0.001). More pramlintide than placebo-treated subjects reported improvements in appetite control (72% vs. 31%), weight control (63% vs. 24%), and overall well-being (52% vs. 17%). No unexpected safety signals were observed. The most common adverse event reported was mild, transient nausea. Pramlintide-treated subjects not reporting nausea experienced weight loss similar to those who did (3.6 ± 0.5% and 3.9 ± 0.5%, respectively). Conclusion: These results support continued evaluation of pramlintide as a potential treatment for obesity.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom