z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Delayed Denosumab Injections and Bone Mineral Density Response: An Electronic Health Record-based Study
Author(s) -
Houchen Lyu,
Sizheng Steven Zhao,
Kazuki Yoshida,
Sara K. Tedeschi,
Chang Xu,
Sagar U. Nigwekar,
Benjamin Z. Leder,
Daniel H. Solomon
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.206
H-Index - 353
eISSN - 1945-7197
pISSN - 0021-972X
DOI - 10.1210/clinem/dgz321
Subject(s) - denosumab , medicine , discontinuation , bone mineral , context (archaeology) , dosing , femoral neck , osteoporosis , confidence interval , urology , paleontology , biology
Context Discontinuation of denosumab leads to a rapid reversal of its therapeutic effect. However, there are no data regarding how unintended delays or missed injections of denosumab impact bone mineral density (BMD) response. Objective We examined the association of delays in injections of denosumab with BMD change. Design We used electronic medical records from two academic hospitals from 2010 to 2017. Participants Patients older than 45 years of age and used at least 2 doses of 60 mg denosumab. Denosumab adherence was evaluated by the medication coverage ratio (MCR). Good adherence corresponds to a dosing interval ≤7 months (defined by MCR ≥93%), moderate adherence corresponds to an interval of 7 to 10 months (MCR 75%–93%), and poor adherence corresponds to an interval ≥10 months (MCR ≤75%). Outcome Measures Annualized percent BMD change from baseline at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. Results We identified 938 denosumab injections among 151 patients; the mean (SD) age was 69 (10) years, and 95% were female. Patients with good adherence had an annualized BMD increase of 3.9% at the lumbar spine, compared with patients with moderate (3.0%) or poor adherence (1.4%, P for trend .002). Patients with good adherence had an annualized BMD increase of 2.1% at the total hip, compared with patients with moderate (1.3%) or poor adherence (0.6%, P for trend .002). Conclusions A longer interval between denosumab injections is associated with suboptimal BMD response at both spine and total hip. Strategies to improve the timely administration of denosumab in real-world settings are needed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom