Use of Continuous Glucose Monitor in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Requiring Insulin Infusion: An Observational Study
Author(s) -
Eileen R. Faulds,
Andrew Boutsicaris,
Lyndsey Sumner,
Laureen Jones,
Molly McNett,
Keaton S. Smetana,
Casey C. May,
Elizabeth Buschur,
Matthew C. Exline,
Matthew D. Ringel,
Kathleen Dungan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.206
H-Index - 353
eISSN - 1945-7197
pISSN - 0021-972X
DOI - 10.1210/clinem/dgab409
Subject(s) - interquartile range , medicine , context (archaeology) , covid-19 , insulin , intensive care , intensive care unit , mechanical ventilation , continuous glucose monitoring , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , glycemic , disease , paleontology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , biology
Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a need for remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective To evaluate feasibility and patient safety of a hybrid monitoring strategy of point-of-care (POC) BG plus continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in the ICU. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting ICU of an academic medical center. Patients Patients with COVID-19 on IV insulin. Intervention After meeting initial validation criteria, CGM was used for IV insulin titration and POC BG was performed every 6 hours or as needed. Main Outcome Measures Outcomes included frequency of POC BG, workflow, safety, and accuracy measures. Results The study included 19 patients, 18 with CGM data, mean age 58 years, 89% on mechanical ventilation, 37% on vasopressors, and 42% on dialysis. The median time to CGM validation was 137 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 114-206). During IV insulin, the median number of POC values was 7 (IQR 6-16) on day 1, and declined slightly thereafter (71% reduction compared with standard of 24/day). The median number of CGM values used nonadjunctively to titrate IV insulin was 11.5 (IQR 0, 15) on day 1 and increased thereafter. Time in range 70 to 180 mg/dL was 64 ± 23% on day 1 and 72 ± 16% on days 2 through 7, whereas time <70 mg/dL was 1.5 ± 4.1% on day 1 and <1% on days 2 through 7. Conclusions This study provides data to support that CGM using a hybrid protocol is feasible, accurate, safe, and has potential to reduce nursing and staff workload.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom