z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prognostic Significance of Copy-Number Alterations in Multiple Myeloma
Author(s) -
Hervé AvetLoiseau,
Cheng Li,
Florence Magrangeas,
Wilfried Gouraud,
Catherine GuérinCharbonnel,
JeanLuc Harousseau,
Michel Attal,
Gérald Marit,
Claire Mathiot,
Thierry Façon,
Philippe Moreau,
Kenneth C. Anderson,
L. Campion,
Nikhil C. Munshi,
Stéphane Minvielle
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of clinical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.482
H-Index - 548
eISSN - 1527-7755
pISSN - 0732-183X
DOI - 10.1200/jco.2008.20.6136
Subject(s) - multiple myeloma , medicine , hazard ratio , oncology , proportional hazards model , multivariate analysis , survival analysis , gastroenterology , confidence interval
Purpose Chromosomal aberrations are a hallmark of multiple myeloma but their global prognostic impact is largely unknown.Patients and Methods We performed a genome-wide analysis of malignant plasma cells from 192 newly diagnosed patients with myeloma using high-density, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to identify genetic lesions associated with prognosis.Results Our analyses revealed deletions and amplifications in 98% of patients. Amplifications in 1q and deletions in 1p, 12p, 14q, 16q, and 22q were the most frequent lesions associated with adverse prognosis, whereas recurrent amplifications of chromosomes 5, 9, 11, 15, and 19 conferred a favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis retained three independent lesions: amp(1q23.3), amp(5q31.3), and del(12p13.31). When adjusted to the established prognostic variables (ie, t(4;14), del(17p), and serum β 2 -microglobulin [Sβ 2 M]), del(12p13.31) remained the most powerful independent adverse marker (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 3.17) followed by Sβ 2 M (P < .0001; HR, 2.78) and the favorable marker amp(5q31.3) (P = .0005; HR, 0.37). Patients with amp(5q31.3) alone and low Sβ 2 M had an excellent prognosis (5-year overall survival, 87%); conversely, patients with del(12p13.31) alone or amp(5q31.3) and del(12p13.31) and high Sβ 2 M had a very poor outcome (5-year overall survival, 20%). This prognostic model was validated in an independent validation cohort of 273 patients with myeloma.Conclusion These findings demonstrate the power and accessibility of molecular karyotyping to predict outcome in myeloma. In addition, integration of expression of genes residing in the lesions of interest revealed putative features of the disease driving short survival.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom