Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series
Author(s) -
Thomas R. Yackel,
Peter J. Embí
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the american medical informatics association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-974X
pISSN - 1067-5027
DOI - 10.1197/jamia.m3294
Subject(s) - workflow , task (project management) , computer science , software deployment , test (biology) , reliability (semiconductor) , quality management , quality (philosophy) , health records , health care , management system , process management , operations management , software engineering , engineering , database , systems engineering , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , philosophy , epistemology , quantum mechanics , economics , biology , economic growth
Test result management is an integral aspect of quality clinical care and a crucial part of the ambulatory medicine workflow. Correct and timely communication of results to a provider is the necessary first step in ambulatory result management and has been identified as a weakness in many paper-based systems. While electronic health records (EHRs) hold promise for improving the reliability of result management, the complexities involved make this a challenging task. Experience with test result management is reported, four new categories of result management errors identified are outlined, and solutions developed during a 2-year deployment of a commercial EHR are described. Recommendations for improving test result management with EHRs are then given.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom