z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Discussion of “Comparison of Base Shears Estimated from Floor Accelerations and Column Shears”
Author(s) -
Goel Rakesh K.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
earthquake spectra
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.134
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1944-8201
pISSN - 8755-2930
DOI - 10.1193/1.4000000.883
Subject(s) - stiffness , shear (geology) , structural engineering , base (topology) , nonlinear system , column (typography) , geology , inertial frame of reference , mathematics , engineering , geotechnical engineering , physics , mathematical analysis , classical mechanics , connection (principal bundle) , petrology , quantum mechanics
The author agrees with Dr. Pinho about difficulties associated with the use of different damping models in nonlinear dynamic analysis. However, the focus of the original manuscript was to illustrate the difference between base shear estimated from floor accelerations, denoted as inertial base shear, and base shear estimated from column shears, denoted as the structural base shear. The difference between the two base shears exists regardless of the damping model used in the nonlinear analysis. In order to illustrate this conclusion, the Los Angeles building of the original manuscript (Goel 2011) was re-analyzed for Earthquake No. 15 using two different Rayleigh damping models: C 1⁄4 α0mþ α1kinitial, in which the stiffness-proportional component is proportional to the initial elastic stiffness, kinitial, and C 1⁄4 α0mþ α1kcurrent, in which the stiffness-proportional component is proportional to the current stiffness, kcurrent.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom