Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective
Author(s) -
JeanLouis Vincent,
J.P. Le Berre,
Jacques Créteur
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
chronic respiratory disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.929
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1479-9731
pISSN - 1479-9723
DOI - 10.1191/1479972304cd021rs
Subject(s) - beneficence , medicine , autonomy , distributive justice , intensive care unit , nursing , perspective (graphical) , critically ill , intensive care , economic justice , intensive care medicine , engineering ethics , neoclassical economics , artificial intelligence , political science , computer science , law , economics , engineering
Background:Many deaths are now preceded by an end of life decision, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU), but such practices vary considerably between countries, ICUs and individuals, depending on many factors including cultural and religious background, family and peer pressure and local practice. Aims:In this review, we will discuss the application of the four key ethical principles-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and distributive justice - to withdrawing/withholding decisions. Methods: Drawing data from several national and international studies, we then summarize the current situation across Europe regarding such practices before making some suggestions as to how we could facilitate the often difficult decision making process by improved communication between staff, patient and relatives.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom