z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Acquisition and processing pitfall associated with clipping near-surface seismic reflection traces
Author(s) -
Steven D. Sloan,
Don W. Steeples,
P. E. Malin
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 172
eISSN - 1942-2156
pISSN - 0016-8033
DOI - 10.1190/1.2807051
Subject(s) - reflection (computer programming) , filter (signal processing) , clipping (morphology) , seismic trace , wavelet , data processing , geology , event (particle physics) , seismology , computer science , acoustics , artificial intelligence , computer vision , physics , database , philosophy , linguistics , quantum mechanics , programming language
The processing of clipped seismic traces may produce high-frequency wavelets that can be misinterpreted as reflections in filtered shot gathers and common-midpoint (CMP) stacked sections. To illustrate this effect, a near-surface CMP seismic reflection survey was conducted using two sources to compare the effects of various band-pass frequency filters on clipped traces. An event observed in the clipped data set replicated the frequency of the filter operators applied, similar to the effect of convolving a boxcar function with the filter operator. The anomaly exhibited hyperbolic moveout and imitated a reflection during the processing stages. The hyperbolic event was flattened by NMO corrections chosen for the target reflection, and it stacked in as a coherent event in the final section. Clipped data should be removed or corrected before processing to prevent misinterpreting high-frequency reflection artifacts in trace gathers and stacked sections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom