z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fixed-source and fixed-receiver walkaway seismic noise tests: A field comparison
Author(s) -
P. Vincent,
Georgios P. Tsoflias,
Don W. Steeples,
Steve Sloan
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 172
eISSN - 1942-2156
pISSN - 0016-8033
DOI - 10.1190/1.2337573
Subject(s) - geophone , offset (computer science) , seismogram , computer science , telecommunications , seismology , geology , programming language
Seismologists and geophysical literature often use the term “walkaway” to describe any survey used to analyze wavetrains based on source-to-receiver offset. A distinction should be made between receiver-group moveout (fixed-source walkaway) and source moveout (fixed-receiver walkaway) when multiple channels simultaneously record signal from multiple independent geophones. Three data sets are presented that illustrate this distinction: one collected in an area where a fixed-receiver walkaway survey recorded similar data and was more time efficient than a fixed-source walkaway survey, and two others collected in an area where dipping reflectors and laterally varying velocities caused the fixed-receiver walkaway data to be significantly different than the fixed-source walkaway data. The results show that, while still useful, clarity in recorded data is lost when fixed-receiver walkaway surveys are substituted for fixed-source walkaway surveys in areas with uneven surface topography, dipping interfaces, or la...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom