Influence of uncemented humeral stem proximal geometry on stress distributions and torsional stability following total shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract Background While surgeons tend to implant larger stems to improve torsional stability, numerous studies demonstrated that increasing humeral stem diameter could exacerbate stress‐shielding and lead to bone resorption. We aimed to determine the influence of humeral stem proximal geometry on stress distributions and torsional stability following total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods Preoperative computed tomography scans were acquired from 5 patients and processed to form 3‐dimensional models of the proximal humerus. Computer models of 3 generic implants were created based on three designs: predominantly oval, semi‐angular, and predominantly angular. All stems shared identical head geometry and differed only in the proximal metaphyseal area. Finite element analyses were performed, with the humerus rigidly constrained distally, and loaded to simulate the joint reaction force. Implant torsional stability and proximal bone stress distributions were assessed for the three different stem designs with three sizes: oversized (stem making contact with the cortical diaphysis), normosized (one increment smaller) and undersized (two increments smaller). Results Considering the normosized stems, the angular design increased the physiologic bone stresses at the proximal section by 39–42%, while the oval and semi‐angular designs reduced them by 5–9% and 8–13%, respectively. The oval design exhibited a median rotation of 2.1°, while the semi‐angular and angular designs exhibited median rotations of 1.8°. Conclusion The semi‐angular stem granted an adequate compromise between physiologic stress distributed by the oval stem and torsional stability of the angular stem. Surgeons should be aware of the various benefits and drawbacks of the different humeral stem designs to ensure adequate torsional stability and physiologic loading.