z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does simulated walking cause gapping of meniscal repairs?
Author(s) -
McCulloch Patrick C.,
Jones Hugh L.,
Hamilton Kendall,
Hogen Michael G.,
Gold Jonathan E.,
Noble Philip C.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of experimental orthopaedics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 18
ISSN - 2197-1153
DOI - 10.1186/s40634-016-0047-3
Subject(s) - cadaveric spasm , medial meniscus , medial collateral ligament , meniscus , compression (physics) , biomechanics , weight bearing , gait , medicine , knee joint , ligament , anatomy , orthodontics , materials science , surgery , osteoarthritis , physics , physiology , alternative medicine , incidence (geometry) , pathology , optics , composite material
Background The objective of rehabilitation following meniscal repair is to promote healing by limiting stresses on repairs, while simultaneously preserving muscle strength and joint motion. Both protective protocols limiting weight bearing and accelerated which do not, have shown clinical success. This study assesses the effects of physiologic gait loading on the kinematic behavior of a repaired medial meniscus. Methods The medial menisci of eight fresh cadaveric knees were implanted with arrays of six 0.8–1.0 mm beads. Pneumatic actuators delivered muscle loads and forces on the knee as each specimen was subjected to a simulated stance phase of gait. Meniscus motion was measured at loading response, mid stance, and toe‐off positions. Measurements were performed using biplanar radiography and RSA, with each knee: (a) intact, (b) with posterior longitudinal tear, and (c) after inside‐out repair. Results The tissue spanning the site of the longitudinal tear underwent compression rather than gapping open in all states (intact [I], torn [T] and repaired [R] states). Average compression at three sites along the posterior half of the meniscus was: posterior horn −0.20 ± 0.08 mm [I], −0.39 ± 0.10 mm [T], and −0.20 ± 0.06 mm [R] ( p  = 0.15); junction of posterior horn and body −0.11 ± 0.12 mm [I], −0.21 ± 12 mm [T], −0.17 ± 0.09 mm [R] ( p  = 0.87); and adjacent to the medial collateral ligament −0.07 ± 0.06 mm [I], −0.29 ± 0.13 mm [T], −0.07 ± 0.17 mm [R] ( p  = 0.35). The entire meniscus translated posteriorly from mid‐stance to toe off. Displacement was greatest in the torn state compared to intact, but was not restored to normal levels after repair. Conclusion The edges of a repaired longitudinal medial meniscal tear undergo compression, not gapping, during simulated gait.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here