
Patient awareness of loss of protective sensation in the diabetic foot: an opportunity for risk reduction?
Author(s) -
McAra Sylvia
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of foot and ankle research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.763
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 1757-1146
DOI - 10.1186/1757-1146-4-s1-p37
Subject(s) - medicine , sensation , reduction (mathematics) , diabetic foot , rehabilitation , foot (prosody) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , diabetes mellitus , intensive care medicine , geometry , mathematics , biology , linguistics , philosophy , neuroscience , endocrinology
Background Peripheral sensory neuropathy is a common complication in diabetes. Neuropathy is the single most powerful risk factor for diabetic foot amputation. Often foot care efforts are thwarted by the phenomenon of inadvertent injury, from events which may appear to the clinician as chronic and ignorant self-neglect on the part of neuropathic clients. This study aimed to determine the proportion of a study populatio no f people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy who were simultaneously unaware of this sensory loss. Method Thirty-two (32) people with symptoms of diabetic neuropathy were tested. Subjects aligned themselves with one of two groups. Group1 consisted of those who predicted that their protective sensation was intact, by indicating that they expected to be able to feel if a blister was forming on their foot, and Group 2 comprised those who expected not to be able to feel if a blister was occurring. The presence or absence of protective sensation was determined by testing with the 5.07 (10 gram) Semmes Weinstein monofilament. Results Seventy-eight percent (78%) of the study population (25 of 32 subjects) assumed that their protective sensation was intact, however only twenty-five percent (25%) of these (8 subjects) were correct in this assumption according to the test criteria. Fifty-three percent (53%) of the total study population (17 of 32 subjects) demonstrated a lack of protective sensation and a concomitant lack of awareness of this loss. Conclusion