z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Obinutuzumab vs rituximab for advanced DLBCL: a PET-guided and randomized phase 3 study by LYSA
Author(s) -
Steven Le Gouill,
Hervé Ghesquières,
Lucie Obéric,
Franck Morschhauser,
Hervé Tilly,
Vincent Ribrag,
Thierry Lamy,
Catherine Thiéblemont,
Hervé Maisonneuve,
Rémy Gressin,
Krimo Bouhabdallah,
Corinne Haïoun,
Gandhi Damaj,
Luc Matthieu Fornecker,
Réda Bouhabdallah,
Pierre Feugier,
David Sibon,
Guillaume Cartron,
Christophe Bonnet,
Marc André,
Loïc Chartier,
Philippe Ruminy,
Françoise KraeberBodéré,
Caroline BodetMilin,
Alina Berriolo-Riedinger,
Josette Brière,
Jean-Philippe Jaı̈s,
Thierry Jo Molina,
Emmanuel Itti,
Olivier Casasnovas
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
blood
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.515
H-Index - 465
eISSN - 1528-0020
pISSN - 0006-4971
DOI - 10.1182/blood.2020008750
Subject(s) - medicine , rituximab , obinutuzumab , hazard ratio , international prognostic index , diffuse large b cell lymphoma , chemotherapy regimen , vincristine , neutropenia , regimen , febrile neutropenia , surgery , oncology , gastroenterology , chemotherapy , cyclophosphamide , confidence interval , lymphoma
Rituximab plus polychemotherapy is the standard of care in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). GAINED, a randomized phase 3 trial, compared obinutuzumab to rituximab. Transplant-eligible patients (18-60 years) with an untreated age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score ≥1 DLBCL were randomized (1:1) between obinutuzumab or rituximab and stratified by aaIPI (1; 2-3) and chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone plus vindesine, bleomycin [ACVBP] or vincristine [CHOP]). Consolidation treatment was determined according to response to interim positron emission tomography (PET). Responders after cycle 2 and 4 (PET2−/PET4−) received immunochemotherapy. Responders after only cycle 4 (PET2+/4−) received transplantation. The primary objective was an 8% improvement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 80% power; α risk, 2.5%; 1-sided) in 2-year event-free survival (EFS) in the obinutuzumab arm. From September 2012, 670 patients were enrolled (obinutuzumab, n = 336; rituximab, n = 334). A total of 383 (57.2%) were aaIPI 2-3, 339 (50.6%) received CHOP. Median follow-up was 38.7 months. The 2-year EFS was similar in both groups (59.8% vs 56.6%; P = .123; HR = 0.88). The 2-year PFS in the whole cohort was 83.1% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 85.8%). PET2−/4− and PET2+/4− had similar 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): 89.9% vs 83.9% and 94.8% vs 92.8%. The 2-year PFS and OS for PET4+ patients were 62% and 83.1%. Grade 3-5 infections were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm (21% vs 12%). Obinutuzumab is not superior to rituximab in aaIPI ≥1 DLBCL transplant-eligible patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01659099.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom