z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Second-line therapies in immune thrombocytopenia
Author(s) -
Rachael F. Grace,
Cindy Neunert
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.321
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1520-4391
pISSN - 1520-4383
DOI - 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.698
Subject(s) - immune thrombocytopenia , medicine , adverse effect , quality of life (healthcare) , platelet , intensive care medicine , pediatrics , nursing
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare, acquired autoimmune condition characterized by a low platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. Although many children and adults with ITP will not need therapy beyond historic first-line treatments of observation, steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and anti-D globulin, others will have an indication for second-line treatment. Selecting a second-line therapy depends on the reason for treatment, which can vary from bleeding to implications for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to likelihood of remission and patient preference with regard to adverse effects, route of administration, and cost. Published studies of these treatments are limited by lack of comparative trials, in addition to inconsistent outcome measures, definitions, and efficacy endpoints. This article provides an up-to-date comparison of the second-line treatments, highlighting important outcome measures including bleeding, HRQoL, fatigue, and platelet counts, which influence treatment selection in a shared decision-making model.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom