Transfusion strategies in hematologic and nonhematologic disease
Author(s) -
Jeffrey L. Carson,
Roger Strair
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.321
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1520-4391
pISSN - 1520-4383
DOI - 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.548
Subject(s) - medicine , clinical trial , blood transfusion , intensive care medicine , stroke (engine) , disease , hematologic disease , pediatrics , mechanical engineering , engineering
Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the risks and benefits of RBC transfusion through the performance of large clinical trials. More than 7000 patients have been enrolled in trials randomly allocating patients to higher transfusion thresholds (∼9-10 g/dL), referred to as liberal transfusion, or lower transfusion thresholds (∼7-8 g/dL), referred to as restrictive transfusion. The results of most of the trials suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy is safe and, in some cases, superior to a liberal transfusion strategy. However, in patients with myocardial infarction, brain injury, stroke, or hematological disorders, more large trials are needed because preliminary evidence suggests that liberal transfusion might be beneficial or trials have not been performed at all.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom