English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An otherwise healthy 60-year-old male was diagnosed with stage II multiple myeloma by the International Staging System characterized by anemia, diffuse lytic bone lesions, IgG kappa paraproteinemia, 45% bone marrow plasmacytosis and the t(4;14) by FISH and conventional cytogenetics. The patient had a very good partial remission with initial induction therapy consisting of four 3-week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus dexamethasone 40 mg days 1-4 (all cycles), followed by a cyclophosphamide and G-CSF mobilized melphalan 200 mg/m2 autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and experienced minimal side effects. He is doing well 60 days post-ASCT and is in a near complete remission. His oncologist recommends maintenance therapy with lenalidomide or bortezomib, but the patient is concerned about the increased risk of developing a secondary malignancy (SM), and because he has had such an encouraging response to induction therapy, he wonders if he could remain off therapy.

hematology

What is the Benefit of Maintenance Therapy with Lenalidomide or Bortezomib after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and What is the Risk of Developing a Secondary Primary Malignancy?