z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What is the Benefit of Maintenance Therapy with Lenalidomide or Bortezomib after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and What is the Risk of Developing a Secondary Primary Malignancy?
Author(s) -
Emma C. Scott,
Donna Reece
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.321
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1520-4391
pISSN - 1520-4383
DOI - 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.205
Subject(s) - lenalidomide , medicine , bortezomib , multiple myeloma , autologous stem cell transplantation , cyclophosphamide , melphalan , maintenance therapy , transplantation , oncology , pomalidomide , surgery , chemotherapy
An otherwise healthy 60-year-old male was diagnosed with stage II multiple myeloma by the International Staging System characterized by anemia, diffuse lytic bone lesions, IgG kappa paraproteinemia, 45% bone marrow plasmacytosis and the t(4;14) by FISH and conventional cytogenetics. The patient had a very good partial remission with initial induction therapy consisting of four 3-week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus dexamethasone 40 mg days 1-4 (all cycles), followed by a cyclophosphamide and G-CSF mobilized melphalan 200 mg/m2 autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and experienced minimal side effects. He is doing well 60 days post-ASCT and is in a near complete remission. His oncologist recommends maintenance therapy with lenalidomide or bortezomib, but the patient is concerned about the increased risk of developing a secondary malignancy (SM), and because he has had such an encouraging response to induction therapy, he wonders if he could remain off therapy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom