What Makes a Process Theoretical Contribution?
Author(s) -
Charlotte Cloutier,
Ann Langley
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
organization theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2631-7877
DOI - 10.1177/2631787720902473
Subject(s) - process (computing) , computer science , structuring , typology , variance (accounting) , conceptual schema , conceptual framework , ontology , conceptual model , management science , data science , epistemology , sociology , psychology , cognitive psychology , engineering , philosophy , recall , business , accounting , finance , database , anthropology , economics , operating system
In recent years, there have been many calls for scholars to innovate in their styles of conceptual work, and in particular to develop process theoretical contributions that consider the dynamic unfolding of phenomena over time. Yet, while there are templates for constructing conceptual contributions structured in the form variance theories, approaches to developing process models, especially in the absence of formal empirical data, have received less attention. To fill this gap, we build on a review of conceptual articles that develop process theoretical contributions published in two major journals ( Academy of Management Review and Organization Studies) to propose a typology of four process theorizing styles that we label linear, parallel, recursive and conjunctive. As we move from linear to parallel to recursive to conjunctive styles, conceptual reasoning becomes more deeply embedded in process ontology, while the standard structuring devices such as diagrams, tables and propositions traditionally employed in conceptual articles appear less useful. We offer recommendations that may be helpful in enriching and deepening process theoretical contributions of all types.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom