Development and Assessment of an Otolaryngology‐Specific Surgical Priority Scoring System

Objective To develop and assess an otolaryngology‐specific surgical priority scoring system that incorporates varying levels of mucosal involvement. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Academic medical center. Methods A novel mucosal score was developed based on best available evidence. This mucosal score was incorporated into the Medically Necessary, Time‐Sensitive (MeNTS) score to generate a MeNTS‐Mucosal (MeNTS‐M) score. A retrospective cohort of patients was identified to assess the surgical priority scoring systems. Inclusion criteria included all scheduled surgical procedures between March 23, 2020, and April 17, 2020. Decisions about whether to proceed or cancel were made based on best clinical judgment by surgeons, without use of any surgical priority scores. The predictive value of the surgical priority scoring systems was assessed in this retrospective cohort. Results The median MeNTS score was significantly lower in adult patients whose surgery proceeded compared to those for whom the surgery was cancelled (48 vs 56; P =. 004). Mucosal and MeNTS‐M scores were not statistically different based on whether surgery proceeded. Among adult patients, the highest area under the curve (AUC) was for the MeNTS scoring system (0.794); both the mucosal and MeNTS‐M systems had lower AUC values (which were significantly lower than the AUC for the MeNTS scoring system). Conclusion This study represents development and assessment of the first otolaryngology‐specific surgical priority score and incorporates varying levels of mucosal disruption. The combined MeNTS‐M scoring system could be a valuable tool in appropriately triaging otolaryngology–head and neck surgery procedures.