Endovascular therapy versus intravenous thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection ischemic stroke – Results from the SWISS registry
Author(s) -
Christopher Traenka,
Simon Jung,
Jan Gralla,
Rebekka Kurmann,
Christoph Stippich,
Barbara Goeggel Simonetti,
Henrik Gensicke,
Hubertus Mueller,
KarlOlof Lövblad,
Ashraf Eskandari,
Francesco Puccinelli,
Jochen Vehoff,
Johannes Weber,
Susanne Wegener,
Levke Steiner,
Georg Kägi,
Andreas R. Luft,
Roman Sztajzel,
Urs Fischer,
Leo H. Bonati,
Nils Peters,
Patrik Michel,
Philippe Lyrer,
Marcel Arnold,
Stefan T. Engelter
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
european stroke journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 2396-9881
pISSN - 2396-9873
DOI - 10.1177/2396987317748545
Subject(s) - thrombolysis , medicine , cervical artery , stroke (engine) , dissection (medical) , ischemic stroke , cardiology , surgery , ischemia , myocardial infarction , mechanical engineering , engineering
In patients with stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, we compared endovascular therapy to intravenous thrombolysis regarding three-month outcome, recanalisation and complications.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom