Recanalization treatments in basilar artery occlusion—Systematic analysis
Author(s) -
Perttu J. Lindsberg,
Tiina Sairanen,
Simon Nagel,
Oili Salonen,
Heli Silvennoinen,
Daniel Strbian
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
european stroke journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 2396-9881
pISSN - 2396-9873
DOI - 10.1177/2396987316629889
Subject(s) - medicine , thrombolysis , revascularization , modified rankin scale , cohort , stroke (engine) , occlusion , basilar artery , surgery , odds ratio , cohort study , ischemia , ischemic stroke , myocardial infarction , mechanical engineering , engineering
Basilar artery occlusion is a most devastating form of stroke, and the current practice is to reverse it with revascularization therapies. Pharmacological thrombolysis, intravenous or intraarterial, has been adjuncted or replaced with invasive, endovascular thrombectomy procedures. The preferred approach remains unknown and many recanalizations are futile with no clinical benefit. We sought to determine reasons for futility and weigh the existing reports to find whether endovascular mechanical interventions provide superior outcomes over pharmacological thrombolysis alone.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom