The Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Children in Seven South Asian Countries
Author(s) -
Adamcheck Amanda,
Carville Kaya,
Cilingiroglu Senem,
Clements Rachael,
Ford Stacy,
Ingham Louisa,
Macris Lucy,
Peddada Yamini,
Pham Hau,
Sarmah Aditya,
Schreur Hanneke,
Signy Katherine,
Steval Katie,
Tunstall Lauren,
Weber Ingram,
Wells Andrew
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
institutionalised children explorations and beyond
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2349-3011
pISSN - 2349-3003
DOI - 10.1177/2349300319894862
Subject(s) - convention , obligation , convention on the rights of the child , political science , law , sri lanka , human rights , south asia , sociology , ethnology
This year marks thirty years since the Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention ) entered into force and ten years since the Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children (the Guidelines ) were adopted. The term ‘alternative care’ refers to the placing of children in the care of someone other than a parent. Although the seven South Asian countries – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka – have ratified the Convention, each of the jurisdictions has reflected the Convention and Guidelines through domestic law in different ways and to different degrees. This article examines the extent to which two key child rights principles enshrined in the Convention have been incorporated into the domestic law of these countries: (a) the obligation to undertake active measures to prevent the unnecessary separation of children from their families and (b) the placing of a child in alternative care as a measure of last resort. While progress has been made across all jurisdictions, effective implementation of policies envisioned by the Convention remains elusive.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom