z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Intra-articular “Cocktail” Offers Clinical Advantages over Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Surgery
Author(s) -
Childs Sean,
Pyne Sonia,
Nandra Kiritpaul,
Mustafa A. Atif,
Bakhsh Wajeeh,
Lalonde Amy,
Peterson Derick,
Giordano Brian D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.329
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2325-9671
DOI - 10.1177/2325967117s00283
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , surgery , femoral nerve , anesthesia , hip arthroscopy , pacu , nerve block , lumbar plexus , arthroscopy , lumbar
Objectives: Arthroscopic hip surgery has gained considerable popularity over the past several years. Attempts to optimize peri and postoperative pain control continues to represent a challenge and opportunity for clinical improvement. Multiple regional anesthesia strategies have been utilized by arthroscopic hip surgeons, including lumbar plexus and femoral nerve blockade, however these options can be associated with setbacks including technical difficulty, intravascular injection, increased post-operative fall risk and the development of peripheral neuritis. Therefore, exploration of alternative regional anesthesia strategies holds promise for improved clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore the efficacy and complication rate of intra-articular anesthetic administration in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery.Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify all patients undergoing elective arthroscopic hip surgery between November 2013 and April 2015. Subjects were stratified into either a group that had received a preoperative femoral nerve block for perioperative pain control or a group that had an intra-articular injection of local anesthetic administered by the surgical team intraoperatively. Objective data, including pre and post-op pain scores in the PACU, total dose of narcotics required perioperatively, occurrence of falls and development of peripheral neuropathy were collected for analysis. Data was compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression modeling. Statistical significance was determined as p<0.05.Results: After excluding patients who did not meet the criteria for study participation, a total of 193 patients were included in this study. At the time of surgery, one hundred eighty three patients (95%) demonstrated evidence of labralchondral pathology and bony morphology characteristic of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). One hundred five patients (54%) received a pre-operative femoral nerve block and 88 patients (46%) received an intra-operative intra-articular injection of anesthetic agents. Linear models for post-operative pain, controlled for patient age and pre-operative pain levels, revealed that patients receiving pre-operative femoral nerve blocks had significantly less pain at discharge (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between patients receiving pre-operative femoral nerve blocks and those receiving intra-articular injections at post-operative weeks 1, 3 and 6. Patients receiving pre-operative femoral nerve blocks were found to be 3.6 times more likely to experience a post-operative fall (OR 3.58, p < 0.05) and were 14 times more likely to experience post-operative neuropathy (OR 13.99, p < 0.01) than patients receiving an intra-articular injection.Conclusion: Intra-articular anesthetic administration was found to be similar in efficacy to pre-operative femoral nerve blocks at reducing post-operative pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Additionally, patients receiving intra-articular injections had a significantly decreased risk of falling post-operatively or developing peripheral neuritis, known complications of femoral nerve blocks. With this information, intra-articular anesthetic administration appears to be a safe alternative to femoral nerve blocks in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.Table 1Demographic DataGroup 1: Fem Block (n=105) Group 2: IA Block (n=88) P valueSex, n       Male 38 27 0.42 Female 67 61  Age, mean ± SD, y 33.4 ± 13.02 31.3 ± 14.05 0.29Smoking history, n     0.66 Yes 28 26   No 77 62  Workers Compensation, n     0.24 Yes 4 1   No 101 67  History of Chronic Pain, n     0.35 Yes 4 6   No 101 82  Table 2OutcomesGroup 1: Fem Block (n=105) Group 2: IA Block (n=88) P ValuePreoperative          Preoperative pain, mean ± SD 3.54 ± 2.69 3.69 ± 2.43 0.69Intraoperative          Total Dose of Dilaudid, mean ± SD, mg 0.18 ± 0.33 0.22 ± 0.37 0.40Postoperative          Pain on PACU Arrival 4.59 ± 2.85 6.16 ± 2.56 <0.01*  Pain at Discharge 3.55 ± 2.26 4.28 ± 3.13 0.03*  Pain at 1 week 3.05 ± 2.18 2.75 ± 2.16 0.34  Pain at 3 weeks 1.96 ± 2.13 1.82 ± 2.07 0.64  Pain at 6 weeks 1.70 ± 2.09 1.59 ± 1.95 0.7  Reported a fall, n 19 5 <0.01*  Developed Peripheral Neuritis, n 26 2 <0.01*

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom