English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objectives:   Previous reports regarding arthroscopic management of dysplastic hip morphologies have conflicting results. Arthroscopy alone in the setting of dysplastic morphologies is controversial.Methods:   We retrospectively reviewed 88 hips (77 patients, 71% female, mean age 33.9 years) with radiographic findings consistent with hip dysplasia and a mean 26.0 months follow-up (range 12-80 months) after hip arthroscopy. Procedures performed included 67 labral repairs (76%), 20 selective labral debridements (23%), 72 capsular repair /plications (82%), and management of associated cam-type morphology in 63 hips (72%). All radiographs were evaluated for parameters consistent with dysplasia including the LCE, Neck Shaft angle, Tonnis angle, Extrusion index, femoral head lateralization, and break in Shenton's line. Preoperative and post-operative function were evaluated prospectively using the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), SF-12 scoring, and pain on a visual analog score (VAS). Patient demographics, procedures performed, and radiographic parameters were evaluated with regards to functional outcomes. In addition, the results of the dysplastic cohort were compared to an aged matched cohort of 231 hips (215 patients, 52% female, mean age 32 years) performed during the study period with a mean follow-up 22.7 months (12-60 months) that underwent arthroscopic FAI correction without the diagnosis of dysplasia.Results:   The mean LCE was 20.8 degrees (range, 8.7 - 24.5), and mean Tonnis angle was 11.0 (range, 0 - 22.2 degrees). The dysplastic cohort had a mean latest MHHS of 81.3 (range, 34-100) and mean 15.6 point (range, -28 - 60) improvement in MHHS compared to 88.4 points and 24.4 points, respectively, in the FAI cohort (p 0.05). There were no iatrogenic subluxations / dislocations in either group.Conclusion:   Although functional scores were improved post-arthroscopy in hips with mild to borderline dysplastic morphologies, Good/Excellent results were inferior and Failure rates were higher compared to an FAI cohort. These results were independent of gender. Associated cam-type FAI, and labral repair / capsular plications were predictive of better clinical outcomes in the dysplastic cohort. Outcomes after pelvic osteotomy in this borderline population are required to determine the optimal treatment.

Arthroscopic Management of Dysplastic Hip Morphologies