z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Who, Where, and How of Interviewing Peers
Author(s) -
Loretto Quinney,
Trudy Dwyer,
Ysanne Chapman
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
sage open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.357
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2158-2440
DOI - 10.1177/2158244016659688
Subject(s) - interview , phenomenon , psychology , space (punctuation) , value (mathematics) , phenomenology (philosophy) , social psychology , lived experience , process (computing) , semi structured interview , qualitative research , epistemology , sociology , computer science , social science , psychotherapist , philosophy , machine learning , anthropology , operating system
Research within a phenomenological framework is aimed at understanding the lived experience of participants to capture the essences of their combined stories to provide new insights and truths surrounding a particular phenomenon. Essential to this process is the acquiring of data representative of the experience being researched. The art of unstructured interviews is to acknowledge and value participants’ stories as each participant traverses deeply personal experiences with the interviewer. This article examines the impact of factors that influence the successful interviewing of peers and explores how ignoring the foundational elements of “who, where, and how” may result in lean or even skewed data. Aimed at accessing the essence of a phenomenon through conversational interviews, the authors offer an adaptable framework that considers the additional elements of “space, language, role, and trust” which is aligned with the intent of phenomenological studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom