Understanding Statistical Testing
Author(s) -
Peter J. Veazie
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
sage open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.357
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2158-2440
DOI - 10.1177/2158244014567685
Subject(s) - statistical hypothesis testing , p value , alternative hypothesis , statistics , type i and type ii errors , set (abstract data type) , multiple comparisons problem , econometrics , null hypothesis , statistical power , a priori and a posteriori , mathematics , psychology , computer science , epistemology , philosophy , programming language
Statistical hypothesis testing is common in research, but aconventional understanding sometimes leads to mistaken application andmisinterpretation. The logic of hypothesis testing presented in this article providesfor a clearer understanding, application, and interpretation. Key conclusions are that(a) the magnitude of an estimate on its raw scale (i.e., not calibrated by the standarderror) is irrelevant to statistical testing; (b) which statistical hypotheses are testedcannot generally be known a priori; (c) if an estimate falls in a hypothesized set ofvalues, that hypothesis does not require testing; (d) if an estimate does not fall in ahypothesized set, that hypothesis requires testing; (e) the point in a hypothesized setthat produces the largest p value is used for testing; and (f) statistically significantresults constitute evidence, but insignificant results do not and must not beinterpreted as evidence for or against the hypothesis being tested
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom