z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Data sovereignty: A review
Author(s) -
Patrik Hummel,
Matthias Braun,
Max Tretter,
Peter Dabrock
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
big data and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.244
H-Index - 37
ISSN - 2053-9517
DOI - 10.1177/2053951720982012
Subject(s) - sovereignty , variety (cybernetics) , deliberation , context (archaeology) , normative , clarity , divergence (linguistics) , sociology , law and economics , epistemology , political science , computer science , law , politics , artificial intelligence , geography , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology
New data-driven technologies yield benefits and potentials, but also confront different agents and stakeholders with challenges in retaining control over their data. Our goal in this study is to arrive at a clear picture of what is meant by data sovereignty in such problem settings. To this end, we review 341 publications and analyze the frequency of different notions such as data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and cyber sovereignty. We go on to map agents they concern, in which context they appear, and which values they allude to. While our sample reveals a considerable degree of divergence and an occasional lack of clarity about intended meanings of data sovereignty, we propose a conceptual grid to systematize different dimensions and connotations. Each of them relates in some way to meaningful control, ownership, and other claims to data articulated by a variety of agents ranging from individuals to countries. Data sovereignty alludes to a nuanced mixture of normative concepts such as inclusive deliberation and recognition of the fundamental rights of data subjects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom