z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Poor monitoring of physical health in patients referred to a mood disorders service
Author(s) -
David Lack,
R. I. G. Holt,
David S. Baldwin
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2045-1261
pISSN - 2045-1253
DOI - 10.1177/2045125314560734
Subject(s) - medicine , referral , population , anxiety , mood , disease , mood disorders , depression (economics) , mental health , mental illness , psychiatry , family medicine , environmental health , economics , macroeconomics
Background: Severe mental illness is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality, most commonly from cardiovascular disease. Much of the risk is explicable by potentially modifiable factors such as diabetes and dyslipidaemia, and regular screening of patients with severe mental illness is recommended. Screening and intervention for physical illness among people with schizophrenia is often suboptimal, but little is known about monitoring physical health in patients with affective (mood and anxiety) disorders.Method: Electronic and paper records were examined for evidence of monitoring of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the 12 months prior to assessment in patients attending a tertiary referral specialist service for affective disorders over a period of 39 months. The number of contacts with healthcare services was calculated for each patient to provide an estimate of the opportunities for monitoring.Results: Notes for 113 patients were examined. The mean number of contacts with outpatient services in the 12 months before assessment was 6.9 (standard deviation 7.7). Documented evidence of physical-health monitoring was seen in only 29 patients: monitoring was more commonly undertaken in patients with recurrent unipolar depression and in those who had undergone recent inpatient treatment. Contacts that could have allowed monitoring of physical health were common.Discussion: Although most patients had multiple contacts with health services in the 12-month period before their assessment in the service, there was little evidence of use of primary-prevention measures to reduce the risks of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in this vulnerable population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom