Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems | Zendy

Guido Freckmann | Zendy; Annette Baumstark | Zendy; Nina Jendrike | Zendy; Jochen Mende | Zendy; Sebastian Schauer | Zendy; Manuela Link | Zendy; Stefan Pleus | Zendy; Cornelia Haug | Zendy

Open Access

Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems

Author(s) -

Guido Freckmann,

Annette Baumstark,

Nina Jendrike,

Jochen Mende,

Sebastian Schauer,

Manuela Link,

Stefan Pleus,

Cornelia Haug

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

journal of diabetes science and technology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.039

H-Index - 75

eISSN - 1932-3107

pISSN - 1932-2968

DOI - 10.1177/1932296820948873

Subject(s) - linear regression , accuracy and precision , statistics , calibration , blood glucose self monitoring , mathematics , medicine , continuous glucose monitoring , insulin , glycemic

Measurement accuracy has been assessed for many different blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS) over the years by different study groups. However, the choice of the comparison measurement procedure may impact the apparent level of accuracy found in such studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research