z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Critical Reappraisal of the Time-in-Range: Alternative or Useful Addition to Glycated Hemoglobin?
Author(s) -
Lutz Heinemann,
Guido Freckmann,
Dirk MüllerWieland,
Monika Kellerer
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of diabetes science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.039
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1932-3107
pISSN - 1932-2968
DOI - 10.1177/1932296819883885
Subject(s) - glycated hemoglobin , continuous glucose monitoring , target range , glycated haemoglobin , medicine , diabetes control , diabetes mellitus , range (aeronautics) , diabetes treatment , current (fluid) , intensive care medicine , glycemic , computer science , endocrinology , type 2 diabetes , materials science , engineering , artificial intelligence , electrical engineering , composite material
The HbA1c value is a well-established parameter used to characterize glucose control. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived parameters calculated using daily glucose profiles such as Time-in-Range (TiR) have increasingly been gaining interest for assessing a patient’s current therapy. The question has arisen as to whether TiR could replace HbA1c? Because TiR focuses on the current quality of glucose control during a minimum of 10 to 14 days of CGM use and reflects the variability of glucose concentrations. Time-in-Range could be considered an attractive option for improving diabetes control in patients with diabetes. Due to the lack of established standards for glucose measurements with CGM systems, results from different CGM systems can deviate from each other. Time-in-Range should not be viewed as a replacement for HbA1c, but should be used to deliver valuable additional information.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom