z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A qualitative investigation into clinical documentation: why do clinicians document the way they do?
Author(s) -
Stella Rowlands,
Amina Tariq,
Steven Coverdale,
Sue Walker,
Maryann Wood
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
health information management journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.603
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1833-3575
pISSN - 1833-3583
DOI - 10.1177/1833358320929776
Subject(s) - documentation , qualitative research , workflow , medicine , medical record , health care , nursing , medical education , psychology , computer science , political science , sociology , surgery , social science , database , law , programming language
Clinical documentation is a fundamental component of patient care. The transition from paper based to electronic medical records/electronic health records has highlighted a number of issues associated with documentation practices including duplication. Developing new ways to document the care provided to patients and in turn, persuading clinicians to accept a change, must be supported by evidence that a change is required. In Australia, there has been a limited number of studies exploring the clinical documentation practices and beliefs of clinicians.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom