Comment: On the Role of Appraisal Processes in the Construction of Emotion
Author(s) -
Tobias Brosch
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
emotion review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.798
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1754-0747
pISSN - 1754-0739
DOI - 10.1177/1754073913489752
Subject(s) - appraisal theory , psychology , constructivist teaching methods , epistemology , cognitive appraisal , cognitive psychology , natural (archaeology) , social psychology , cognition , mathematics education , teaching method , philosophy , archaeology , neuroscience , history
Appraisal and constructivist theories of emotion both emphasize that emotions are not modular phenomena, but are constructed from more basic psychological parts. In the scientific debate, differences between the two approaches are sometimes overplayed, by classifying appraisal theories as “natural kinds” models, and sometimes underplayed, by basically merging them into constructivist accounts. The aim of this contribution is to illustrate some similarities and some differences between contemporary appraisal and constructivist approaches, and to highlight the fact that appraisal theory has indeed already confronted the idea of construction in the elicitation of emotion. In doing so, I want to argue that, while there is a distinction between appraisal and constructivist camps, it is not as stark as one might think, even though the names of the “ingredients” of emotions may differ
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom