z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Conscientious objection to deceased organ donation by healthcare professionals
Author(s) -
David Shaw,
Dale Gardiner,
Penney Lewis,
Nichon Jansen,
Tineke Wind,
Undine Samuel,
Denie Georgieva,
Rutger J. Ploeg,
Andrew Broderick
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of the intensive care society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.551
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 2057-360X
pISSN - 1751-1437
DOI - 10.1177/1751143717731230
Subject(s) - organ donation , conscientious objector , health professionals , context (archaeology) , health care , donation , tissue donation , medicine , transplantation , abortion , law , nursing , political science , surgery , pregnancy , paleontology , genetics , spanish civil war , biology
In this article, we analyse the potential benefits and disadvantages of permitting healthcare professionals to invoke conscientious objection to deceased organ donation. There is some evidence that permitting doctors and nurses to register objections can ultimately lead to attitudinal change and acceptance of organ donation. However, while there may be grounds for conscientious objection in other cases such as abortion and euthanasia, the life-saving nature of donation and transplantation renders objection in this context more difficult to justify. In general, dialogue between healthcare professionals is a more appropriate solution, and any objections must be justified with a strong rationale in hospitals where such policies are put in place.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom