z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Radiological evaluation of postoperative osteomyelitis in long bones: Which is the best tool?
Author(s) -
Andrew Zhou,
Milind Girish,
Azeem Thahir,
Jiang An Lim,
Xiaoyu Chen,
Matija Krkovič
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of perioperative practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2515-7949
pISSN - 1750-4589
DOI - 10.1177/1750458920961347
Subject(s) - osteomyelitis , medicine , radiological weapon , modalities , magnetic resonance imaging , amputation , radiology , soft tissue , surgery , social science , sociology
Currently, definitive diagnosis of osteomyelitis involves a combination of clinical signs, symptoms, laboratory tests, imaging modalities and cultures from blood, joint or body fluid. Imaging plays a critical role in the osteomyelitis diagnosis. Each of these tests incurs an additional cost to the patient or healthcare system and their use varies according to the preference of the healthcare professional and the healthcare setup. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of postoperative long bone osteomyelitis, with the aim of reducing long-term complications such as non-union, amputation and pathological fractures. In this review, we discuss the key findings on different radiological modalities and correlate them with disease pathophysiology. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging is the best available imaging modality due to its sensitivity in detecting early signs of long bone osteomyelitis and high soft tissue resolution. Other modalities such as radio-nuclear medicine, computed tomography and ultrasound have been proved to be useful in different clinical scenarios as described in this narrative review.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here