z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Peer Feedback in Aesthetic Labour: Forms, Logics and Responses
Author(s) -
Laura Vonk
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cultural sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1749-9763
pISSN - 1749-9755
DOI - 10.1177/1749975520962368
Subject(s) - taste , inequality , work (physics) , control (management) , aesthetics , sociology , qualitative research , social psychology , public relations , psychology , political science , economics , social science , management , engineering , art , mechanical engineering , mathematical analysis , mathematics , neuroscience
Research on aesthetic labour has largely been confined to studying practices and experiences of managerial control and self-discipline. However, co-workers also have an impact on the experiences and practices of aesthetic labour. This article explores peer feedback regarding personal aesthetics in work situations without clear organisational aesthetic guidelines. Testimonies of experiences of peer feedback from 28 qualitative wardrobe interviews with ‘frontstage’ and creative workers in insecure employment positions show that peer feedback (1) is often ambiguous both in content and form; (2) can contain both a commercial logic and logics of ‘belonging’; and (3) is not only accepted, but in many cases is seen as legitimate and taken very seriously by workers on the receiving end. This study illustrates how informal processes of control and distinction concerning personal appearance intensify and complicate experiences of aesthetic labour as the interplay between market logics and judgements of taste has the potential to act as a reinforcement of insecurities and inequalities

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom